Connect with us


Education doesn’t need any more phony fists, plastic dashikis, and revolutions that won’t be funded

Let’s have some family talk about the one thing your revolution gets wrong all day long: education.

My social justice siblings, you’ve got nothing but pipe dreams and polemics in your arsenal for saving the eight million black children whose brains are being systemically diminished in the public school classrooms you worship so hard as if they invented vegan barbeque.

You tell our people their best prospect is to dedicate themselves to the preservation of schools that have harmed them for decades. That pitch is emotional, seemingly earnest, and straight up suicidal.

I’ll need you to stop.

More than a century and a half since black people emerged from America’s dirtiest era of inhumanity, with literacy as their top objective, doesn’t it bother your soul that we – a nation full of money and supposed expertise – have zero States where more than 20% of black children are proficient in reading?

Instead of focusing on that you join the Upper Westside crunchy mamas who see our children as broken and frame our kids as damn near unteachable.

Like them, you too believe unacceptable rates of student proficiency stem from everything outside of the classroom and nothing within it.

That’s wrong.

In fact, what happens in the classroom matters and you should stop ignoring the teaching problem, curriculum problem, and school leadership problem that is holding our kids hostage.

None of it is fixed by your obsessive defense of a system that fails to teach our children the most basic skills; a hurtful system that on top of everything else still beats black children in 2018?

Why is it those problems only matter to you when they happen in non-unionized charter schools?

That’s more than suspicious, don’t you think?

You have a plan, though.

If only we vote the right way and fight for “full-funding” we’ll part the red seas of educational failure and walk our children to the public education promised land where all races and classes perform equally.

Forgive me, but that’s stupid.

No one has ever succeeded in being a community leader and unintelligent at the same time.

Please don’t try so hard to be the first.

Which brings us to your real problem: your entire education agenda was handed to you on the back of a napkin (and on the first page of a grant agreement) by the good people behind Netroots and “Our Revolution”. [actually their revolution]

I see you.

I see your militant sounding demands for a better education that were cut and pasted from the market-tested campaign materials created by the American Federation of Teachers.

They have you out here singing about plutocrats who want to “privatize” our schools – as if the black intellect is public property and black children should be wards of the same state that is killing them in the streets, over-punishing them in the courts, over-incarcerating them in prisons, disenfranchising them at the polls, and feminizing their poverty in welfare systems – when, in fact, the hands of Big Labor, Annenberg, the Tides Foundation, Ford, Open Society and their network of white-led overseeing organizations have their hands so far up you bottom that they can tickle your tonsils.

Call me for receipts. I have many.

I refuse to play this game of who is more grassroots. As a father, I fight for better opportunities than we have available now. That’s why I’m here.

I want an alternative future for black children that’s better than my past. I want newly built black counter-institutions, new education systems, new schools (built on history and our record of self-determination), and new educational practices.

So, spare me the anti-reform taunts and the phony black power fist you raise for the cameras and the sweatshop dishiki (made in China); and your social media profiles wrapped in #solidarity drag (only to mask the fact that many of your pampered asses come from San Francisco or Massachusetts or some similar political location, and your sole connection to “the struggle” and “the work” is a black history course you nearly failed while at a predominantly white institution).

After 20-odd-years in nonprofit work, I could tell you a lot about grant funding, and how it could be better, and how hard it is to do good work without it.

[Full disclosure, I’ve been funded by some of the same people you. I refuse to share your delusions about their moral hygiene].

Consider taking a break from lobbing stones about “dark money” [a term you should see as problematic for obvious reasons] from the upstairs of a glass house that’s fully mortgaged to organizations that practice all the top-down power you say other funders do.

Your funders meet in private, develop agendas, decide which nonprofits they’ll fund and for what issues, and then you show up in our communities with the issues as they’ve been handed down from your monetary Moses.

Do you really believe your Organizing Industrial Complex funding comes from a gloriously pure well of unpolluted dollars that spring naturally from a free-range artisan non-capitalistic garden?

You’re old enough to know better.

When you come for school reform advocates as if our work is disqualified by the virtue of being funded by people with big money, you’re either a hypocrite, a liar, or a professional crisis actor.

Sometimes you’re all three because you’re the anti-reform cliche we know so well: the private school alum with kids in charter or magnet schools who flood our Twitter timelines with links to articles about the horrors of school choice.

You don’t like my money, I don’t like yours, and in the end that doesn’t matter. What matters is our end goal.

Yours is to limit black children to the traditional district schools of yesterday.

I’m looking for every avenue our students and families can use to migrate out of that captivity and into safe harbor.

If one of us is a puppet I’d bet it’s the one telling black people to stay put in schools with a documented record of hurting us.

It’s not the one who tells black people we can and must do so much better.

Pursuing the power of self-sovereignty and personalized learning to create secure citizens and abundant communities. #TheOppositeOfSchool #AllPowerToThePupil

Continue Reading


  1. Pingback: A Lesson in CITIZENship - EduMom

  2. Pingback: Integration is not parents’ priority — Joanne Jacobs

  3. Dan McConnell

    July 16, 2018 at 2:46 pm

    “After 20-odd-years in nonprofit work, I could tell you a lot about grant funding, and how it could be better, and how hard it is to do good work without it.” Experience in a field is tightly correlated to an understanding of how things work and what works well and what doesn’t. Not so much with developing criteria for evaluating outcomes.

    • Blog Master

      July 17, 2018 at 1:48 am

      In my field will developing criteria and evaluating outcomes is not separate from the work, but part of the work itself. Welcome to nonprofit life.

Leave a Reply


If your presidential debate isn’t fit for kids, you’re not fit to be president

The sad presidential debate

In a time when concerns about public health are stealing precious learning time from America’s children, it’s sad that this week’s presidential debate was another dispiriting lesson in failed leadership.

As citizens, we should expect the contest for the American presidency a top civics learning opportunity, but instead, we got schoolyard rock-throwing on Tuesday that wasn’t worthy of our children’s eyes, ears, or seat time.

That’s a shameful sign of three-plus errant years of declining decorum and lost integrity at the top of the American leadership pile – mostly because a lout has led us into moral anarchy.

If a president is the nation’s exemplar of our values and virtues, a presidential debate is a test, then Donald J. Trump spells trouble. The president I saw on Tuesday was a peevish and sweating example of everything I teach my kids not to be. He was rude, accusatory, irresponsible, blame-shifting, dishonest, and, worst of all, a nasty bully.

Let’s be honest here, if Trump were a Black 6th-grader behaving this way in a Houston classroom, he might be suspended and not allowed to return until his parents met with school staff about his self-regulation challenges.

Now, this is where I’m supposed to dazzle you with my broadmindedness by pointing out ways in which Biden fell short too.

Hard pass.

That form of mindless bothsiderism is a shortcut to thinking and judgment. It’s not good for a responsible citizen and fails as an appropriate example for children.

Unlike the president, I don’t see value in teaching our children to equate white supremacists with the convenient ghost of Antifa or the political cartoon of Black Lives Matter. To overstate something moral and obvious: There are no “very fine people” who are so spitting mad about the existence of non-whites that they descend on communities with tiki torches chanting “Jews will not replace us.”

If I fault Biden for anything, it’s not being assertive enough about centering these mass-media opportunities on the nation’s children. In my view, his education plan is expensively inconsequential concerning the things that matter most, but are talked about least: quality teaching, learning to standards, evidence-based educational interventions, and academic outcomes that close gaps between the haves and have-nots.

I waited for his promise to move hell and Earth, unions and bureaucrats, publics and privates, lefties and right-wingers, to ensure every American child gets a practical education that prepares her for life in the economic mainstream (a promise that every president since Lyndon Johnson has made), but instead, the former Vice President mostly shadow-boxed the patently erratic orangish gentleman to his right.

My friends, please expect more. When these two private school parents who want to lead the free world take the stage next time to present competing visions for where we should go as a people, let’s hold them to two demands.

Trump v. Biden: who will stand for children in the next presidential debate?

First, they commit to being appropriate examples for our children of how great Americans behave, think, and debate. Or, let them disqualify themselves for failing on that point.

Second, they explicitly detail how their policies will prepare the next generation to be productive members of a free country. They must articulate a plan for systems and policies that allow children to learn in ways that best suit them.

We are so far from that now. Poor academic outcomes for racial minorities, students in poverty, and students with special needs are all too enduring. For example, in most states, less than a quarter of Black students read or perform math proficiently. Non-white students get the worst prepared teachers who – as research tells us – hold implicit biases against them. Further, students of color are more often identified for negative discipline consequences than for gifted programs (even when they don’t qualify for the former and do qualify for the latter).

At the same, education bureaucracies stifle the creativity of teachers through endless standardization. Their lobbying groups fight the emergence of innovative schools and programs that come from chartering laws. Their programs too often limit the most advanced students by gearing the system to a catch-all, mediocre middle.

On top of all that, legacy debts that were born of poor financial decisions compound over time and rob our students of their full per-pupil income by paying for yesterday’s obligations at the expense of tomorrow’s promise.

All the while, we lament the mythical cuts to education funding as the bill for public miseducation and its systemic failures escalates annually.

Hopefully, when they meet again, both candidates seeking our votes in the upcoming election will have something profound to say about how we change the game for students and families. 

The candidates need to can speak to raising the expectations for results in education. We need to know how colleges can prepare better teachers for the classroom and how schools can better support them once they are there. Above all, we need to hear how these candidates can provide more resources directly to families so they can determine how, when, where, and what their children learn. We need a moonshot for things like getting all cities, towns, and rural areas wired with broadband and how we expand the educational opportunities diverse families need.

I’ll be watching the next presidential debate for all that and hoping against hope that two candidates worthy of the nation they want to lead show up with all their best faculties on display. Above all else, I hope they remember the children.

Continue Reading


Crisis parenting isn’t easy, and carry on

We can't help our children by living in our powerlessness

Who will ever tally the toll of mass school closings that have put many families into crisis parenting mode? I’m not sure, but the media messages we get need to be more informative.

There are too many stories about how the sky is falling, and too few about what we can do about it.

Let me use a scenario and to two people.

The scenario: you’re in an elevator in a tall Chicago building with two other people. There is a big bump that jolts the elevator, the lights flicker, and you can tell something bad could be happening.

Person numero uno in the elevator with you starts screaming “we’re going to die!

This is the end!

Person numero dos is calm. She appears to be assessing the situation and considering possibilities for escape.

Person numero uno is the media. He uses words like “disaster” to describe challenges parents face with remote learning. It’s godawful he says. Too hard. Kids hate the new normal. The technology glitches out constantly or bores or confuses them. Teachers cry online. Parents suck at teaching. It’s nearly impossible to stay on top of kids and their studies while also working (for those privileged enough to work from home).

Along those lines, columnist Peg Tyre wrote in Forbes last spring “[r]eality is dawning that parents of school-aged children can’t work and educate their children at the same time.”

I take issue with that. Parents can and must educate their children, even while balancing other demands of life. Even during a global pandemic. There is no other option. Period.

Damnit, that’s what being a parent means. You signed up for it. Now do it.

I suggest you consult with Person numero dos. She won’t tell you what you want to hear (that you’re a martyr and woe is you), but she’ll say what you need to hear (toughen up buttercup).

No, life isn’t always convenient.

Yes, you’re in possibly the toughest situation ever.

Yet, worshipping the problem won’t make it less tough. These are your kids and you were always responsible for moving mountains to get them the education they deserve. Schooling has made it easy for you to idle on autopilot, but no more.

I’m not saying Person number uno is wrong to be alarmed. Reality is on his side. There will be negative consequences of closed schools and the curtailing of daily classroom instruction. It will almost certainly stunt the academic growth of children under-resourced families.

We weren’t prepared to turn our homes into makeshift schools without warning. We quickly feel inadequate about assisting our kids. They keep asking us about concepts we haven’t studied in years. We also worry about the looming social emotional and mental health consequences of the isolation of quarantine.

Some will say I’m glossing over the wildly different financial and social situations families live in. Obviously the single parent with a job in hospitality faces far greater challenges than telecommuting professionals currently forming learning pods for their kids. And yet, no matter where you live on the economic totem wallowing won’t help you or your children. Only character will.

I see story after story about the inequities that will be widened because wealthier parents are hiring tutors or teachers and setting up their own micro-schools. Recognizing that as true doesn’t absolve anyone from having to answer the most powerful question: “what am I going to do?

Who has the information that will help us do our best for our kids wherever they are? What is our inventory of resources, connections, and skillsets?

What power do we have that we aren’t using?

Panic and pity will always be inferior to extreme ownership and stress management in my mind. The best thing we can teach children right now is how to confront adversity with a clear head and fortitude.

To that end, it’s time for Person number dos to tell Person numero uno to sit down, zip it, and speak only when spoken to. This is crisis parenting and we should aim to win.

Continue Reading


Children and families are hurting while you take selfies

Families are having a tough time and that’s especially hard on children. So, you’d think that would generate empathy and generosity. Instead, it looks like selfish gene has taken over.

Let me not overstate the problem. But a New York Times story about the ugly and petty clashes pitting Silicon Valley workers with children vs. the those without children is sad commentary on where we are.

Consider this:

When Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook’s chief operating officer, hosted a companywide videoconference on Aug. 20, more than 2,000 employees voted to ask her what more Facebook could do to support nonparents, since its other policies had benefited parents.

The question struck a nerve. An employee wrote in comments accompanying the video feed that it was “unfair” that nonparents could not take advantage of the same leave policy afforded parents. Another wrote that while the procedure for taking leave was usually difficult, it was “easy breezy” for parents.

This problem repeated at Twitter, LinkedIn, and Google. Inter-office chats raged with childless employees expressing frustration with their co-workers who have children, and working parents firing back.


A key to understanding the conflict, at least in my mind, is this snippet from the story: “[the problem is] where workers tend to be younger and have come to expect generous perks and benefits in exchange for letting their jobs take over their lives.”

This is an indictment of the always-on self-loving generation who demand to compensated greatly for losing themselves into work (something that is killing them). 

It’s also a mark against the previous generation that parented them during the self-esteem movement which produced little more than entitlement and isolation.

We should fear repeating those detachment issues with today’s kids who are out-of-school and living through Chromebooks, iPads, and iPhones.

Isn’t it telling the Times’ story is set at tech companies? They are basically narcissism factories providing clout chasing ME-llennials digital tools to live that selfie life, why wouldn’t they attract workers who put their wants ahead of the needs of others.?

Can we really expect the generation that swipes left or right for love to demonstrate genuine empathy? Can we get them to look up from their app long enough to see 9 million of their fellow Americans have dropped out of work to care for children or an elder relative? 

These families don’t have employer-paid wading pools, bike repair shops, free meals, and doggie cafes – but, who cares?

But, they should. We all should. I’m as libertarian as the next guy, but your issues will often become “our” issues. 

Nearly one in five working adults reports not working because the pandemic shuttered childcare options. That’s crazy.

According to the federal government “Of those not working, women ages 25-44 are almost three times as likely as men to not be working due to childcare demands.”

I don’t know when we stopped believing that children and their parents should be a policy priority? And, no, it isn’t one generation of us suffering from an empathy deficit. America is afflicted with that as a whole.

I don’t have an answer for what workplaces do to make their childless workers feel they have benefits equal to working parents, but I know more than ever we need everyone to put kids first.

If not, we’ll all face death by selfie.

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2017 The Business Department, LLC.

%d bloggers like this: